Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“”One goal of the survey was that it be unexpected, he said, so that word could not spread among the sex offenders, giving them time to return to their registered residences.””

they act like we are out there trying to hunt for prey! I also noticed in the article they stated that the feds help them cover overtime charges. It’s amazing how much effort they put in to make sure that PFR’s are following the rules. Maybe they should put that effort into getting drunk drivers off the road. Oh snap, did I say something that would be productive!?

Wait. So the article said a high percentage were in compliance, then said only one wasn’t. That more than a high percentage, that’s pretty much everyone! I noticed they didn’t say what the discrepancy was. Probably such a minor infraction that it didn’t matter or they would have made it a big deal.
I also like how the sheriff said that it was an unannounced “survey”, like the word survey makes it somehow better than residency check. He somehow thought that by announcing it, that PFRs would “run back to their residences”. He seems to think registrants are secretly living in other areas but keep homes just for the “surveys”. Wonder how much of the community’s tax dollars were spent on that failed fiasco, although it does prove that a “ high percentage” are law abiding.

Why is this a surprise? Are they really that lame?

What a way to spin this news article about a costly and wasteful multi-agency compliance search which reaped only a nothing burger into “oh look how committed law enforcement is for our public safety”.

SORNA in general is a big multi-agency grifting game to fool people into thinking that the Registry prevents sex crimes (Truth bomb – it does not) so these fat cops will continue to get paid and lazy politicians will stay re-elected.

Meanwhile Constitutional crimes are being committed against a segment of our society by these multi-agencies because we are convenient scapegoats for all of society’s fears and hatreds thanks to misinformation from the government and mass media.

The Registry is insane. End insanity. End the Registry.

Sure, it’s nice for folks to post a comment here…… But PLEASE also post a response/comment on the article’s TCD website!
Show up!
Stand up!
And FIGHT BACK against the lies and the myths!!

 “This operation shows our commitment to the safety of our community by making sure those who are required to comply with offense-registration laws are regularly monitored.”
So in other words, its like parole or probation, which is part of a punishment. Why else would PFRs be “monitored”?

🤗😃 OMGosh, you crazy, wonderful people!! 🤗 I just checked the article’s website and there are 9 new commentsall anti-Registry – following the article!!!
Thank you, Thank you, everyone!!

Now…. Let’s do this ALL year 2023 long!! Every time we come across one of these “copaganda” articles, let’s respond & fight back!!

Again, Thanks All!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
You have “overjoyed” me!! 😃😁🤗

Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays all!! 🎄🎁🎀